rev banner  Volume 1 Issue 8

In This Issue
Welcome
Podcast-"Let's Talk Computers" Interview with Bob Nolan
Why Consider a Third-party Defragmenter
Cool Tool of the Month Winner
Subscribe
Quick Links
Join Our Mailing List!
Welcome
father's dayHappy Father's Day and welcome to another edition of our newsletter dedicated to keeping your PC healthy and performing like new.
 
It's been a busy month here. We had the launch of PerfectDisk Rx Suite, a new Raxco Software set of tools for keeping your computer in top shape.
 
In this issue, we provide a link to a recent radio interview with Bob Nolan, president and CEO of Raxco Software, discuss why you might want to consider an alternative to Windows' built-in defraggers, and announce the latest winner in our Cool Tool of the Month contest.
 
As always, thanks for reading and providing great feedback.
 
 
Let's Talk Computers Interview
Bob Nolan, President and CEO of Raxco Software, was recently interviewed on the Let's Talk Computers radio show.
 
To listen this interview, click here to hear Bob discuss PerfectDisk Rx Suite, Raxco Software's newest utility for maintaining optimal PC health.
 
Why Consider a Third-party Defragmenter
Both Windows XP and Vista come with built-in defragmenters. So why would anyone need a third-party defragger from a company other than Microsoft? We believe it all goes back to that adage - "you get what you pay for."
 
Let's look at Windows XP. We've addressed the general issue of fragmentation in a previous issue. In a nutshell, we defragment because we want our files put back together in one piece so we can access them faster - whether a photo, Word file, spread sheet, or whatever. Turns out the Windows XP built-in defragger begins and ends with that nutshell. But it's missing the rest of the nut, and all the other nuts in the bowl. 
 
Here are just some of the things wrong with the built-in defragger:
  • Multi-pass defragmentation. The built-in defragger needs to run over and over to defragment all the data files on the drive.
  • It doesn't consolidate the free space on the drive. This leads to much faster refragmentation of the drive, assuming it ever gets completely defragmented in the first place, which is unlikely.
  • It needs 15-20% free space on a drive in  order to work. That's basically telling you to buy a bunch of extra disk space just to let it work.
  • Inability to defragment really big drives with lots of fragmentation. If you're buying larger and larger drives to handle things like video editing, you'll likely run into trouble using the built-in defragger. It just wasn't designed to handle really large drives, especially if they are heavily fragmented. 

There's a whole lot more, but those are just a few of the key ones.

With Vista, Microsoft made some changes to the built-in defragger, but it still doesn't have the full capabilities needed to completely defragment a drive. Furthermore, there is no longer a progress screen with the Vista built-in defragger, so you can't even tell what's going on with the defrag process.
 
If you want the best possible performance on your computer, you owe it to yourself to at least check out an alternative to the built-in defraggers provided in Windows. If you take a close look, you'll see that paying just a little will likely give you a whole lot of improved performance on your PC or laptop investment.
Cool Tool of the Month T-Shirt Winner
tool winnerThis month's Cool Tool of the Month winner is Kailasa Ishaya from Hong Kong.  He 'TRIPLE nominated' DriverHeaven's "Shutdown 1.8.  To check it out click here.
 
newsletter t-shirtBecome the very next winner of this fine t-shirt (Click here to see it in detail) by sending us your nomination for Cool Tool of the Month.  Click the link above at top left to nominate your choice.
If you haven't already done so, don't forget to subscribe to our newsletter mailing list above so that you'll continue to receive future issues.
 
Here's to your healthy PC,
Raxco Software, Inc.